In humans, anxiety states are accompanied by alterations in respiratory patterns.
Despite this clear association, the link between respiration and anxiety has never
been evaluated in experimental animals. The aim of this study was to describe how
anxiety states are reflected in the pattern of respiration using genetically diverse
rats that differ in their level of innate anxiety. Respiratory rate was recorded in
high-anxiety behavior (HAB, n=10) and low-anxiety behavior (LAB, n=10) adult rats using whole-body plethysmography, with a piezoelectric sensor attached
to the chamber to simultaneously monitor physical activity. Rats were introduced in
the pletysmograph and recorded for 40 min. Subsequently, they were exposed to acoustic (predator call), olfactory (cat fur
odor) and psychophysical (restraint) stressful stimuli, with a 5-min intervals between
each stimulus. During the first 20 min in the pletysmograph, HAB rats spent significantly less time ay high respiratory
rates (400–600 cpm) compared to LABs, which likely reflected suppression of the exploratory sniffing
in the new environment. At the end of 40-min baseline period, respiratory rate was
higher in HAB (92±6 cpm) compared to LAB (62±5 cpm, p<0.05) rats. Exposure to the stressful stimuli produced similar tachypnoeic responses
in both groups. However, HAB's respiratory response to the second acoustic stimulus
failed to habituate. In addition, HAB rats showed higher number of sighs (augmented
breaths) both during the first 40 minutes of recording (HAB=19±1 vs. LAB=10±1, p<0.05) and under any stress condition. We conclude that: i) high-anxiety behavior rats
show emotion-related respiratory changes (elevated basal respiratory rate, increase
in the number of sighs, reduced tachypnoea/sniffing in novel environment and no habituation
of the respiratory response to repetitive stimuli) that resemble those observed in
patients with anxiety; and ii) changes in respiratory patterns represent new and promising
way for assessing anxiety states in preclinical studies.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
© 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.