Frailty syndrome is characterized by progressive decline in the ability to maintain
homeostasis as a result of declining resilience and physiological reserves. The evaluation
of baroreflex could provide important information about this syndrome. The aim of
this study was to evaluate the baroreflex in three groups: nonfrail, prefrail and
frail. Twenty three older adults (61-89 years) were evaluated. The electrocardiographic
signal (BioAmp FE132, ADInstruments, Australia) and the arterial blood pressure (Finometer
Pro Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands) were recorded simultaneously
for 15 minutes in supine and orthostatic position. The spontaneous baroreflex was evaluated
by sequence technique (gain αseq) in stationary sequences of 256 points. A two way ANOVA for repeated measures with
Tukey post hoc was performed to evaluate the effects of group, position and interaction.
A significance level was set to 5%. Nonfrail (n = 8; 67 ± 6 years), prefrail (n = 8; 72 ± 11 years) and frail (n = 7; 76 ± 9 years) showed no significant differences for age, gender and betablocker user. Only
nonfrail group presented a significant reduction of gain αseq in supine to orthostatic position (nonfrail: 8.15 ± 1.39 to 4.59 ± 1.86; prefrail: 6.97 ± 4.45 to 5.05 ± 1.90; frail: 5.48 ± 4.87 to 3.82 ± 2.71). These results suggest that frailty syndrome may be linked to an impairment
of the baroreflex and could be already evident in the intermediate stage (prefrail).
Funding: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grant 2013/17936-9, grant 2012/04146-7
and 2010/52070-4; CAPES-PVE (process 23028.007721/2013-4) and CNPq (process 479769/2013-3).
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and ClinicalAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article Info
Identification
Copyright
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.